SCWIT 2022: Cohort 4: Mentors Feedback Form: Meeting 2 Respondent InformationName of Mentor Filling the Form. *Designation/Title: *Email Address: *Mobile Contact: *Name of Startup being mentored? *Name of the Founder Attending the Mentoring Session *Names of Other Team Members Attending the Session * GIVEN WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT YOUR MENTEE NOW, Rank the Session (one a scale of 1-5 with 5 being excellent and 1 being poor)Strength of Founder's/Startup's Business Value Proposition? *Secret Sauce, Unfair Advantage, Barriers to Entry of the Startup? *The ability of the Founder to handle the core/technical processes underlying her product and service? *Founders Understanding of her businesses' underlying Financials (BreakEven, Unit Cost, Cost of Customer Acquisition, Lifetime Value, etc.) *Founder's Strategy and Plans to Market and Sell her Product/Service? *Founders ability to clearly communicate her idea and make a convincing pitch? *Ability of the Founder to Think Through and Communicate an End Game? *i.e. where she wants to be in the medium to long run.The Quality and 'fit' of the Founder's Team? *How much did you feel the female founder either owns or has control / say over the overall venture and its strategy? * Performance of the Mentee / Venture during Mentoring PeriodHow many meetings have you had with your mentee/venture at the time of filling out this report? *On the scale of 1 to 5 (5 being excellent and 1 poor), Kindly rank the founder's (or founding team's) able and willing to listen to advice and learn? *in other words, how coachable is she?On a Scale of 1 to 5 (5 being excellent and 1 poor), Kindly rank the diligence with which the founder took your advice and implemented in after Meeting 1? *On the scale of 1 to 5 (5 being excellent and 1 poor), Kindly rank to what extent you believe the mentee has achieved pre-validation for the technology or scaling project being proposed for funding from SCWIT? *Particularly what she wants to achieve with the SC funded "project"On the scale of 1 to 5 (5 being excellent and 1 poor), Kindly rank how your mentee/venture/team has dealt with little things (punctuality, timeliness, attention to detail, perseverance, etc.)? *On the scale of 1 to 5 (5 being very likely and 1 being least likely), Kindly rank if you had PKR 1.5 million to invest, would you invest in your mentees venture? * Detailed Feedback (250 words or less)In no more than 500 words, tell us how the founder(s) responded to the tasks that you requested, how did they respond to the task of achieving pre-validation of the Technology Project, and what is your assessment of how they're likely to do going forward? * VerificationPlease enter any two digits *Example: 12This box is for spam protection - <strong>please leave it blank</strong>:
